![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Martha Nussbaum, "Woman and Cultural Universals," and:
For more assignment ideas involving this essay, please visit the Nussbaum link-o-mat. Nussbaum and Armstrong: Religion and the Central Human Functional CapabilitiesIn "Women and Cultural Universals," Nussbaum claims that "a life that lacks any one" of the ten attributes that she has labled "Central Human Functional Capabilities," "no matter what else it has, will fall short of being a good human life." Does Nussbaum's argument require that one create the kind of relationship to a personal God that Armstrong describes? Is it necessary or merely optional that one have a relationship with God or some other spiritual being to live what Nussbaum calls "the good life"? Does God have a future in the world that Nussbaum is arguing for?
In your last essay, I asked you to take a position on the question of cultural relativism versus cultural universalism. Martha Nussbaum offered us the opportunity to compare the rights of a general group, in this case women, to the right of a particular culture to exist. Your next article, Susan Faludi's "The Naked Citadel," also draws attention to the question of a culture's right to exist, but it brings the problem a little closer to home. Faludi shows us the Citadel, a public (state-funded) military institution in South Carolina which was, until recently, exclusively male. Those who were against the admission of women to the Citadel believed deeply in the traditions and internal culture of the college, and believed they had a right to exist without outside interference. For your next essay, I would like you to consider the following question in terms of the two assigned essays: What right does a tradition have to exist? You may also consider any or all of the following support questions: If you believe traditions have some sort of inherent right to exist, why? If not, how would you defend yourself against critics? What, if anything, gives one tradition more weight than another? Does changing particular elements about a tradition destroy it, or is it necessary? Consider Nussbaum's Central Human Functional Capabilities; do they apply to the Citadel? What difference does personal choice make? What about the Citadel's public financial support? Remember to use at least three quotations per author. (To see the rest of the assignments in this sequence, please visit our
sample sequences page.)
Nussbaum, Gladwell, Kaldor: The Power of Context and Global Change
Drafts must be 4 pages long. Final papers must be 5-6 pages long. (To see the rest of the assignments in this sequence, please visit our
sample sequences page.) Barclay Barrios
Kaldor and Nussbaum: War and Human Capability Drafts must be 4 pages long. Final papers must be 5 pages long. (To see the rest of the assignments in this sequence, please visit our
sample sequences page.) Barclay Barrios
Nussbaum and Loffreda: Applying the Argument for Universal Human Rights to an Individual Case Drawing on your reading of Beth Loffreda's "Losing Matt Shepard"
and Martha Nussbaum's "Women and Cultural Universals," make
an argument for Matt Shepard's rights. What rights does he have or
should he have? You may decide to make an argument for Matt's special
status as a gay male. In other words, you may decide that some people
suffer from such extreme discrimination that a special class of rightsgay
rights, women's rights, etc.--needs to be recognized and honored. On the
other hand, you may decide that the best way to prevent incidents like
the murder of Matt Shepard is to argue for certain universal human rights
of the sort that Nussbaum discusses. Will Nussbaum's idea of "Central
Human Functional Capabilities" really solve the social problems that
Loffreda describes? Or do such problems require a different, more specific
and pragmatic approach? When considering the Matt Shepard case, be sure
to pay close attention to the many different attitudes and values that
Loffreda encounters in Laramie. For the rest of this assignment sequence, see the Universal Human Rights, Globalization, and Social Change sequence. Loffreda, Nussbaum, and Schlosser: Moving from Individual Cases to a Theory about Globalization From one perspective, globalization seems benign, even positive. After
all, no one forces people to eat at McDonalds, or to watch American movies,
or to wear American running shoes. We might argue that when it exports
hamburgers and Coke to other countries, the U.S. also exports democracy,
the rule of law, free markets, technological progress and so on. From
another perspective, however, globalization might be viewed as a form
of cultural imperialism, and possibly also a precursor to economic and
political imperialism. It is quite likely right now that 17-year-olds
in Tokyo know more about the U.S. than they do about their own culture
and history. By contrast, while many people in the U.S. know all about
the latest "reality" shows, the majority are probably incapable
of finding Japan on an unlabeled map. For the rest of this assignment sequence, see the Universal Human Rights, Globalization, and Social Change sequence.
Nussbaum and Tannen: The Ethics of ArgumentationHow might Martha Nussbaum respond to Deborah Tannen's argument? Would Nussbaum agree with Tannen that agonistic responses to the beliefs of others truncate discussion and arrest the pursuit of knowledge? Might we say that Nussbaum puts into practice an ethic of principled or righteous intellectual violence, or would that be going too far? Do you believe that she does justice to the perspectives of her opponents? Are they likely to be persuaded by her practice of critique? If her opponents are not likely to find her persuasive, then who might? Frans de Waal, Lani Guinier, Martha Nussbaum: Finding a Ground for Moral Action We have now read three authors--de Waal, Guinier, and Nussbaum--all
of whom explore in different ways the subject of ethics or morality, whether
their concern is altruism among primates, an ethically responsible political
system, or the need for universal human rights. None of them argues for
divine revelation as the basis of ethics.
As you consider the possible sources of moral absolutes, use the three authors to explore the complexities that are produced by any answer to this question. If you are intrigued by the possibility that moral absolutes might come from science, then please explain how we should respond to disagreements within the scientific community. Consider in particular the debates between de Waal's camp and its opponents. Similar complexities must be faced by those who turn to religion as the bedrock of morality. After all, the various religions do not always agree, and even within a single faith, sharp disagreements are quite common. After considering science and religion as sources of authority, you might turn to our nation's civil institutions: the people, you might argue, should be free to decide on the morality they will abide by. But in that case, who qualifies as "the people"? If we base our ethics on majority rule, does that mean that the majority is always right? Needless to say, the questions I have posed here are huge ones. Your paper does not necessarily need to reach a firm conclusion: a strong essay might simply explore the complications of the issue or demonstrate the strengths and limitations of various possible answers. If you manage to come up with a truly compelling answer, one developed in a well-organized, persuasive, and articulate way, you will qualify not only for an "A," but also for a Nobel Peace Prize. Good luck! (To see the rest of the assignments in this sequence, please visit our
sample sequences page.) Kurt Spellmeyer |
|
|
|||
Content questions? Contact Michael Goeller Technical problems/feedback? Contact Maritza Cruz |
Copyright © 2005
Houghton Mifflin Corporation Use of this material granted to Rutgers University Writing Program |
|
|