ESL | Plangere Writing Center   Business & Technical Writing  |  English Department  |  GetIT  |  All Sites... 

Search the Rutgers Writing Program...  

Writing Program Main Page 
301 Course Description 301 Myths Gradatorium Tutorama
Plagiarism Policy Classpages Studenting Skills

 

Gradatorium: This is a C

Introduction |  Criteria explained | Criteria for early papers | Criteria for research papers
Before you download | This is a C | This is a B | This is an A

If you came to this page directly, be sure you read the "Before you download" page. Otherwise, download the entire sample paper in PDF, Word, or text format.

Here's the introduction and body paragraphs from the C paper.:

Multicultural environments are becoming more popular in the United States each year. As "The World Fact Book of Intelligence" reports on the Central Intelligence Agency's web site, for every 1000 U.S citizens there was an average of 3.5 immigrants coming into the U.S .in the year 2000(Central Intelligence Agency website). People are continuously coming into the United States, from other countries for several different reasons. One fairly popular reason for coming to the U.S. is because of the liberal arts education's that are available. Foreign exchange programs offered through universities allow for different ethnic groups to study in U.S. universities. Partly because of this, multiculturalism is becoming an issue in some higher education institutes in the U.S. Another reason for the emergence of multiculturalism is the increase of diversity in the U.S. Diversity in this case refers to the fairly recent equality of rights given to African Americans and the growing equality of women. James A. Banks, a principal architect of multicultural educational reforms writes, "Nearly half about (45.5%) of the nation's school-age youths will be young people of color by 2020."(Webster 21). These issues are creating questions as to whether or not educational reforms need to be made in such institutes in order to make students more prepared for the diversity they may or may not face when pursuing their higher education and lives in the U.S. The purpose of this paper will be to find out whether proposals for such reforms are relevant to undergraduate students.


An ethnic group can be defined as a set of individuals within a larger population that intermarries; shares common national origins, language, religion, or other cultural traits; and is recognized by its members and others (Berkowitz and Berrington 18). A key phrase in this definition is "recognized by its member and others". The interpretation of this phrase to me implies that culture is something that is chosen by an individual and should be respected by other individuals. However, culture is a choice and therefore should not be forced upon anyone. It is a person's personal rite to choose which culture they wish to follow, so it should also be an individual rite to choose whether or not they wish to take courses in universities that study another culture. Of course enhanced knowledge in another culture will help students to respect different cultures because they have some understanding of them, however, lack of understanding of another culture doesn't guarantee that individuals can not respect other cultures either.

Yehudi O. Webster, associate professor in the sociology department at California State University and author of Against The Multicultural Agenda, states an interesting argument held by contemporary educational reformers: "Mind and society are inseparably connected. Hence, because educational practices significantly shape the mind, they would have to be reformed, if social relations are to be transformed."(Webster 169). This is a very strong line of positive reasoning for those seeking educational reform, relating to teaching of other cultures, in Higher Education. It is also interesting that an author like Webster, who is arguing against the need for a multicultural education requirement, would incorporate such a quote in his text. It is true that the mind is what allows people to function, and functioning is key in society. Therefore, it is necessary for people to enhance their knowledge of cultures in their mind, in order to understand the growing number of different cultures surrounding them. Henry A. Giroux, director of the Waterbury Forum in Education and Cultural Studies at Penn State University and author of many books pertaining to multiculturalism in education writes, "Educational theorists demonstrate as little interest in cultural studies as cultural studies scholars do in the critical theories of schooling and pedagogy."(Giroux 230). This statement supports the idea that culture and education are in fact separate issues. A solid relationship between the two has not yet been established. A solid relationship needs to be established between the two in order for multiculturalism to be better understood by students. Diversity is a major issue in universities because of the growing number of people from different cultural backgrounds attending. Some sort of agreement needs to be made between these two issues in order for the issue of diversity to be resolved. Such a proper relationship would include an understanding by educational theorists of the way in which cultural differences relate to the direct education of students, and an understanding by cultural studies scholars as to the way in which the learning of cultural studies would be most beneficial to students. Educators need to recognize the impact that cultural diversity has among student's education and cultural studies theorists need to devise a way to help ease the impact cultural diversity is having on students. The question I raise from this is, should such an academic requirement be instituted and is it absolutely necessary?

Download the Entire Paper

Here are comments from different teachers on how they would grade this paper:

  1. This paper earns a C in part because a project is emerging, though it does take several paragraphs to do so. In the beginning paragraph, the writer raises a number of important questions about multiculturalism and education, but confuses the discussion by relying on statistics that are only generally related to the real issues of the essay. The writer really starts to find his way when he cites Yehudi Webster as a source. The Webster source allows the writer to connect the issue of culture with the larger issue of how, and how well, a society with many cultures functions. At this point, it starts to become clear that the writer's questions about multiculturalism and higher education are linked to questions of the efficient functioning of American society at large. This is not an obvious connection to someone who has not done research in the field, so the writer really achieves something through the discussion in the second body paragraph.

  2. One of the characteristics of a C research paper in 301 is the introduction of important sources without the ability to fully control them. In his research, the writer came across a discipline called Cultural Studies, and because he was doing a project on multiculturalism, assumed that Cultural Studies would be relevant. Unfortunately, the writer confuses Cultural Studies proper with the general study of culture, as if it were a branch of sociology or anthropology. In fact, Cultural Studies is a version of literary studies that originated in Marxist studies of popular culture. It is relevant to the writer's project, but because he confuses CS with studies of multicultural education, the real power of the discipline can't manifest in the current draft. A B-level paper would have to recognize the disinction between Cultural Studies and studies of multiculturalism, and an A paper would begin to be able to explain the difference between the two to the reader.

 

Download Entire Paper

next >>



Content questions? Contact Skiles Howard
( skiles.howard@rutgers.edu )

Technical problems/feedback? Contact Maritza Cruz

Copyright © 2005
Rutgers University Writing Program
All Rights Reserved

Printer-friendly page